Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]DR. BLACKTAPE CAN STAND IT NO LONGER... ...IF THE *((&^*&^%&*()+_(&*^&*!!!! CAMERA FALLS APART, IT'S NOT AS GOOD AS ONE THAT DOESN'T. IF IT DOESN'T FALL APART, SHUT UP AND GO TAKE SOME PICTURES! ;-) P.S. "Reliable sources" have brought down at least one sitting President of the U.S. >Ed Buziak wrote: > > > > Marc, > > > > Mike Johnston is a fine journalist and a photo magazine editor... as > such he > > hears many things, some of which cannot be passed on openly. Although more > > of a "rookie", as you say across the pond, I am in a similar position and > > have heard opinions on the matter from someone who knows more about > > repairing (and, thus, the construction of) Leicas than most today... > like he > > has serviced around *one hundred* Leica-250s! > > > > After I sold my M6 and replaced it with an M3 I asked my friend if the > > earlier model was indeed a better instrument, as it truly felt, but do you > > know, his "wise-old-owl" reply was... > > > > "...if you are attracted by the features which are exemplified by > > rangefinder camera design, then > > despite its age, the M3 is still an excellent choice. However, the > Leica > > M series has evolved and > > doubtless will continue to do so. The current M6 with its TTL metering > > really does provide the > > photographer with a tool that is capable of excellent results." > > > > I can't tell you what he *really* said because (like Mike rightfully > argues) > > it's off the record. But I feel confident enough, having been told by an > > authority, to pass the information on as *fact* if I am asked... and would > > feel rather disappointed to receive the retort "so much BS" for my > > unattributed advice. Mike and fellow editors (and Erwin) may or may not > know > > something from time to time of what is being planned for the future at > > Solms, Tokyo and elsewhere... and we receive "secret" internet addresses > > which show products and press releases for inclusion in forthcoming > > publications... we can't tell you even if we wanted to... and even if > we did > > we couldn't reveal our sources, period! > > > > Ed Buziak / Publisher > > "Camera & Darkroom" > > > > ed.buziak@camera-and-darkroom.co.uk > > >Ed the fact that you and Mike are Journalists unfortunately puts you in a >position where we do not expect less from you, we expect more. >And this applies to other "authorities" on a "pedestal" of any sort who >want to >announce to us the bad news or good news "inside story" about what a true >piece >of cr&^ our cherished expensive little toys are. >We don't expect a "journalist" to say or certainly write things along the >lines of: > >"Severely reliable top unnamed sources have let me in on the fact that this >thing is not built very well" Who cares? >I've had high school teachers who would kick me out of the class for this type >of statement. > >We are supposed to lie down and roll over because someone of "authority" >status >makes sweeping cloaked unsubstantiated statements?! >The journalists I've spoken to over the years and I have done some just don't >speak in those terms: large unsubstantiated and/or cloaked statements. >They know no one wants to hear it and stop listening quick. >They know that anything they say is meaningless unless properly qualified. Why >write? Why talk? >I am very familiar with your magazine as well as Mikes so I am surprised such >basic issues as these are on the floor. >You wanna tell me something that is significant and going to "rock my >world" but >you don't want to tell me where you got it from? >We should just listen to the true rumors form the authorities who would >have us >trade in our M6's for M3's or 4's. >I'm surprised a trained and experienced Journalist would speak in these terms. >I would hope people on this list with a more solid background in >Journalism will >weigh in on this. >I don't proclaim to be an expert on Journalism but I'll be damn amazed if >I'm wrong. >Mark Rabiner