Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Lens Tests?
From: Nathan Wajsman <nathan.wajsman@euronet.be>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:29:11 +0100

Steve,

I think that you might want to consider investing a little effort in reading
Erwin's articles. He uses very specific language to describe rendition of detail
etc., such as "extremely fine" or "very fine." Yes, it is simpler to read a review
that simply ends with one numerical score but it does not tell you very much. To
follow your car analogy, if you read that one car does 0-60mph in 5 sec. and
another in 5.5 sec., does this mean that car 1 is "better" than car 2? Certainly
not; it simply says that it accelerates faster, but it does not tell you anything
about comfort, handling, vibration, engine noise and the many other attributes that
make a drive pleasurable or painful. At the end of the article the car magazine may
summarize its review with one score (or a number of stars, or something) but if you
really want to know what kind of car it is, you have to read the article. Same
thing with lens tests.

Nathan

Steve LeHuray wrote:

> Hans,
> Thanks for the reply, but, I have already done all the stuff you recomend.
> Neither Erwin or Gandy assigns a number like was assigned to those lens on
> your post. Being a car guy I can understand a comparison test where for
> example the benchmark for performance is usually 0-60 and there is a number
> to relate to, (0-60 = 4.6 sec). Gandy's information is pretty much all
> heresay and MEGO (Mine Eyes Glaze Over) when I try to read ANYTHING Erwin
> writes.

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Overijse, Belgium

General photo site: http://belgiangator.tripod.com/
Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/
Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/