Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Fuji building an M
From: "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 10:49:08 -0800

Quietness is not everything. How many people buy a camera based on decibel
levels of  sound? Very few, I am sure, compared to the millions who buy a
camera based on modern features that make  it easier to take photos.

Leica should retain the M6 for those who love it for what it is. Leica
should also follow the example of Nikon and the production of the F3. Since
1980, the year of introduction of the venerable F3, there have been many
innovations in camera technology (autofocus, electronic shutter, 1/250sec
synch., built-in winder, etc) but the F3 has endured and is still available
20 years later.

Were it not for the difference in viewfinders, I would have abandoned the M6
in favor of the Contax G2 long ago.

As long as corporate health is at stake, Leica should introduce a more
modern rangefinder camera to capture a larger sector of  the market and
retain the anachronistic M6 for the diehards. It would not be merely a
merchandising ploy but a survival gambit.

Joseph Codispoti




From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk@lucent.com>

> Leica needs to do something.  Perhaps Herr Cohen was just feeding you
> propaganda.
> I think the cloth shutter was nice 50 years ago. But every manufacturer
has
> a more modern one, so why not Leica?  Surely they can make it quiet.  The
> "me too" scenario is nonsense.
>
> Peter K