Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Canon F.95 vs Noctilux
From: ALEXSCIFI@aol.com
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 23:11:51 EST

In a message dated 2000-01-23 9:52:35 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
bieleckj@freeway.net writes:

<< >>  Regarding the Canon 50mm F0.95 lens:
 > > I have seen shots taken with that lens..It sucked.  It is also reputed
 to
 > > have contained a radioactive element, so don't put it under your pillow
 at
 > > night:)
 > >
 >
 > Wouldn't a radioactive element in a lens cause film fog?  Seems strange
 that
 > it should be purposely built in...
 
 I think the original poster is talking about Thorium, which was commonly
 used by many lens manufacturers in the 50's and 60's in their high speed
 lenses.
 
  >>

Canon also used Thorium in their early 35F2.0 lenses.  It isn't Thorium you 
have to worry about though. It's Cobalt Thorium G. According to a reputable 
source:

            "Cobalt thorium G has a radioactive half-life of ninety-three 
years.
            If you take, say, fifty H-bombs in the hundred megaton range and
            jacket them with cobalt thorium G, when they are exploded they 
            will produce a doomsday shroud. A lethal cloud of radioactivity 
            which will encircle the earth for ninety-three years!"

Alex

;o)