Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Wilber: I totally agree with everything that you have said about the R8. It is a manual camera and it was intended to be just that. Many of us agree that the camera is not market competitive in the world of auto-focus. My experience with the R8 was not as pleasant as yours and I gave 2 of them a world class try. Two winders didn't work and in one of them the electronics went "kaput." I would still own them, problems and all if they had been autofocus. I wish I could see and if I could I would have been a lot more tolerant. Bob - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffcoat Photography" <jeffcoatphoto@sumter.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2000 9:17 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] R8 marketplace performance and the LUG > Thank you Greg for telling it like it is. Long live the > R8!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > Cheers Wilber > > GBicket wrote: > > > Morning all, > > > > Back from Ding Darling Wildlife Sanctuary, and awaiting processing of my > > transparencies, and reading through the digests, I come across yet another > > in the regular pissing-upon-the-R8 parades. I'll not debate those who > > impugn the wisdom of offering a non-AF SLR in today's marketplace. Sales > > activity of non-AF SLR's had slowed relative to the sales of AF cameras of > > all flavors, prior to the release of the R8. > > > > I have spent a most satisfying week plus, behind Leica glass and an R8, > > peering out at waterfowl and large reptiles wintering in one of southwest > > Florida's safe places. The camera performed flawlessly, and if it has laid > > light on film as it has for so many exposures on so many rolls, the egrets, > > and the herons, and the spoonbills, and the kingfishers, and the pileated > > woodpeckers, and the ospreys, and the alligators that I spent so many > > relaxing hours watching through the viewfinder will be accurately rendered. > > > > The R8 is not a camera which was represented as having autofocus and then > > failed to deliver. Not once. The R8 is a manual focus camera which > > delivers extraordinarily well exactly what it represents it will. Indict > > Leica's market analysts, all those LUGgers whose disappointment is so bitter > > that the R8 is not an AF camera. > > > > The R8 is a great manual camera. Deal with it. > > > > It is an exceptional SLR, with a distinctive design target, ergonomics, > > precise meter, and set of features. It's ideal for some, off the mark for > > others, but refreshingly without compromise. If the R8's are not the set of > > features you seek in an SLR, there are ample alternatives. > > > > Buy one of them. Please. And soon. > > > > The R8 suits many perfectly in terms of design philosophy, and for me, and > > many who have actually used it, a joy with which to make beautiful > > photographs. R8 is what it is, and I'm grateful for that. Whining about it > > will no more imbue it with autofocus than change its ergonomics. Neither > > are changes I seek. If there were an R8 AF available, I would own that > > body, ALSO. > > > > I for one, am convinced that Leica will make changes in design, and in > > design philosophy not a moment before it is damned good and ready, and not a > > moment [or a camera model] sooner. While it does that at its own peril in a > > competitive marketplace, isn't Leica's following its own path part of what > > makes its products great? Does market acceptance of plastic cameras mean > > that Leica should make its M6 body out of polycarbonate? Do you really > > think all the violin playing will bring us a Leica SLR with AF any sooner? > > Or is this better placed on www.justwannakeepbitchingaboutanything.com ? > > > > Let me close with thanks to R8-hating LUGgers for suppression of R8 sales, > > as this will make extra bodies more affordable in the short term future. > > But you're missing out on a good one. > > > > Enjoy the light. > > > > Greg >