Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Barry, This is so sad, in my opinion Leica is a firm who makes cameras that are great to work, fine quality and in my opinion best optics worldwide, on the other hand this cameras are something for the heard. But emotinal discussing about a camera is difficult. You can collect cameras I do so and you can use cameras I do so too. But for the camera you work with, you have to look about facts. Sure the M5 is no typical M body but it was a innovation ,the first rangefinder with built in meter in 1971 it was an innovation. A question are leica users only people who like the old fashions? Are they against innovations? Could someone who lives in yesterday be a good photograph? Heretical questions I know, but in my opinion worth a discussion. Sorry for my bad english. Best to you all Gabriele Gabriele, I, too, am at a loss to understand this. The M5 was one of the best-engineered and best-built items in the Leica line (rivalling the M3 in build quality). However, I suspect that the introduction of too many *real* innovations in one model was just too much for conservative-minded leicaphiles to accept. What puzzles me most is the M5's general lack of popularity even today. Here on the LUG, the M5 is essentially unacknowleged. It's like a dirty little family secret that no one wants to discuss openly. I suspect that when the collectors line up their M-bodies on the shelves of their glass-fronted display cases, they don't like to see anything standing a bit taller than the others. Cheers, Barry ( ;{ - --- Gabriele_Müller <hepac@bluewin.ch> wrote: > Hello all! > > I for my person never understood why so many people did not like > the M5. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com