Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I remember looking at the M5 in the early 1970:s. It costed a fortune, so I got a CL a while later. The CL shutter broke down after 3 rolls, so I brought it back and switched to a new black chrome M4. I guess I could afford that because the M4 was 30-40% cheaper, but I am not sure. Maybe the M5 was far too expensive for most people except pros? About the present: -Does the M5 have the same PX-625 battery problem as the MR-meter? I mean, you can get them, but they are expensive?!? And how about the two lugs type: -Can they be rebuilt into three lugs by a repair man? Hans > Some people just did not like the larger body. This, however, did not kill > the M5. Most of the credit goes to the CL for that. Almost all the same > features at a cheaper price. I think Leica was hoping to find new customers > with the CL not take customers away from its premium (read money making) M > line. The only people who made money from the CL were Minolta who made it > for Leica. > > John Collier