Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Why don't we do a lens by lens comparison between Contax and Leica. First off, how does the Contax 75/1.4 compare with Leica's? Hmmm, wait a minute, I don't think Contax makes one. OK, then, how does the Contax 50/1 compare with Leica's? Hmmm, wait a minute, I don't think Contax makes one. OK, then, how does the APO 90/2 Contax lens compare with Leica's? Hmmm, wait a minute, I don't think Contax makes one. OK, then, how does the Contax 35/1.4 compare with Leica's? Hmmm, wait a minute, I don't think Contax makes one. OK, then, how does..... Dan C. At 09:25 AM 29-02-00 EST, ARTHURWG@aol.com wrote: >More to the point than Leica vs. Nikon is the question of Leica vs. Contax, >namely the G2. It's become apparent that the Japanese-made Zeiss optics are >equal or better than many/most Leitz offerings. Coupled with a better view >finder, a very good auto focus and much less money, Contax has to be the >leader among 35 mm rangefinders. Right?? > >