Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I am having problems with newtons rings in my Minolta Diamage Scanner. Where can I purchase this pumice powder. Thanks Bill Grimwood At 02:27 PM 3/1/00 -0800, you wrote: >Newton rings are caused by imperfect contact by part of the film with >glass. Film with more curl are more prone to newton rings. Current humidity >also is a factor as to the severity of the problem. > >One solution is, of course, to eliminate all contact between film and >glass. This is why glassless neg carriers are so popular. > >Many years ago (1950's) Kodak recommended rubbing the glass (that which has >contact with the film) with fine (00) pumice powder using cotton. This >basically makes the surface layer of the glass, less "glazed" so that the >type of film/glass contact, producing newton rings, does not take place. >The use of 00 pumice powder makes no humanly observable difference. But it >makes a difference in how the film base and glass get along. > >Jim > > >At 09:59 AM 3/1/00 +0200, FB wrote: >>Thanks a lot for your help in solving my newton-ring problem. >>First of all I was wondring why Leitz made enlarges which were Newton >>sensitive. The answer is that they were not newton-sensitive with the >>emulsions of the 50's and 60's. They were not that thin and glossy. >>The solutions can be divided in two groups : >>1. Anti-newton glass >>- Leitz anti-newton glass but the Leitz anti-newton glass is hard to >>find (impossible ?) >>- Make anti-newton glass yourself with the AN-glass of a 6x6 slide >>frame. That must be a good solution but glass doesn't cut as easily as >>paper and make sure the edges do not scratch the negative. >>2. Avoiding contact between the negative and the condensor. >>- Tape of the 24x36mm frame and make sure the tape is not too thin >>(the misake I made). >>- Make a frame to put on the negative stage with a 24x36mm cut out. I >>made it out of medical film. >>I am working with the last solution now which works very well for me. >>I also have the feeling that it is more forginving for dust on the >>negatives. >>Greetings, > >