Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] M6 50mm frame line verses M2,M4,M4-2 50mm frame line
From: john <bosjohn@mediaone.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 06:15:01 +0000

John Collier wrote:
> 
> Forgive me for asking this but could you be confusing the 75 frame with the
> 50mm? The 50mm lens has focussed to .7 meter since 1969 with version 11817.
> 
> John Collier (who deserves to be flamed for such audacity)
> 
> > From: john <bosjohn@mediaone.net>
> >
> > I was just sitting here fiddling with and M4 and M6, and I noticed, much to my
> > surprise, the 50mm frame line in the M6 is smaller than the M4.  I thought to
> > myself, self, how odd, so I got out an M2 and M4-2. The M2, M4, M4-2 50mm
> > frame lines all seemed to include the same within the frame but the M6
> > included noticeably less within the frame line. I double checked by putting
> > the cameras on a tripod and setting markers ten feet from the camera ( two
> > light stands) to mark the edges of the 50mm frame line for the M4. Replacing
> > the M4 with the M6 the frame lines were, as I said noticeable narrower, though
> > I did not measure how much. It looked like about three inches or so.
> >
> > The only reason I can think of for this oddity is that Leica resized the frame
> > to be accurate at the closest focusing distance when the 50mm Summicron
> > decided it could focus to 28" instead of 40".
> >
> >
I am pretty far gon, but no, I didn't mistake the 75mm frameline for the 50mm.
Bosjohn