Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]There is another reason for the 1.0, or any of the low f-stop lenses, and that is limited depth of field. It makes for amazing shots when nothing is in focus but the subject you are focused on. You can't get the 'flat' depth of field with a 2 or a 2.8 that you can with a 1 or 1.4. - ---------- From: B. D. Colen Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2000 10:31 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: 35/1.4 ASPH vs Noct Depends on your needs: all around low light lens? 35 Summilux ASPH. Lens for shooting in available darkness when nothing else will get the shot? Noctilux. You buy the 35 S ASPH to use for many purposes; you buy the Noct. for a single purpose. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Ken Iisaka Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2000 7:18 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: 35/1.4 ASPH vs Noct From: <drodgers@nextlink.com> > > Help me out here. Which lens does everyone think is the lens to get? A > 35/1.4 ASPH or a Noctilux. Both.