Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] mike gil? who the heck is mike gil?
From: "Mueller, Rob" <rob.mueller@eds.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 09:23:49 -0500

er. I just don't expect you to be incorrect. ' slings and stones', an
aberration, right?

Rob Mueller
Studies in Black and White
www.studiesinblackandwhite.com 
rob@studiesinblackandwhite.com





- -----Original Message-----
From: Marc James Small [mailto:msmall@roanoke.infi.net]
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 8:01 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] mike gil? who the heck is mike gil?


At 02:26 PM 3/10/2000 -0800, Brian Reid wrote:
>(But: he's the guy who had posted, a month or so, a note about how he had 
>produced a financial justification for buying a Noctilux; the group 
>responded by saying that buying a Noctilux was an act of passion and not of

>cost accounting. I guess he didn't appreciate that response.).

But I took no part in that discussion and he still assailed me.  Ah, well,
the slings and stones of outrageous fortune!

Marc

msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!