Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on 14/3/00 6:27 pm, Xavier Planellas at xplanell@openbank.es wrote: > I don't know if the 35/2.8 Summaron performs better than the > 35/3.5. I've said this before, but I had a 35/3.5 Summaron and it was a pig. Like any leica lens it was sharp as a needle around f8, but I never seem to have that much light, and at 3.5.... yuk. In any case, 3.5 is one stop too slow in many situations. Moreover, it was a goggled M3 lens, which is an ergonomic nightmare. Not one of Leica's high points, IMHO. - -- Johnny Deadman photos: http://www.pinkheadedbug.com music: http://www.jukebox.demon.co.uk