Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Paul Chefurka wrote: ><Snip> > I find the difference between a 35 and a 50 on an M to be substantial, and > am glad I own both. For a first WA on an M, all things considered, my vote > is for a 35 of some description. > > Paul Chefurka I'm with Paul and B.D. the 35 is a disparate object from a 50. I often use a 40 on my Rollei 35 and find that real change from the before mentioned above. Not splitting hairs here! But you're gonna get less distortion from a Leica M 28 or 24 then you are from the same SLR lens. But I still say get the 35, you will thrive with a Leica M 35. The Summicron ASPH to be exact. Been out shooting with mine all day! Takes a licken and keeps on tickin! Mark Rabiner