Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Winder M Info Please
From: John Collier <jbcollier@home.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 17:05:55 -0600

If it is a Winder M you have the "latest" version of the winder for M
cameras. The various winder versions are:

Winder M4-2 before serial n. 10350 - single shot only, battery compartment
can be attached using an extension lead for cold weather shooting. No tripod
socket. Stay away from this unit as it has a great deal of problems

Winder M4-2 serial no. 10350 and above - continuous shooting possible (only
with 1/60 and up) and the same battery housing as above. This new mechanism
is the used in all the recent winders

Winder M4-P and M -new design of battery housing cannot be attached via a
cable but now has a tripod socket.

The winder is officially out of production and stocks are thin on the
ground. The former Canadian Leica distributor told me they were working on a
new winder design using the latest micro-motors but he told me not to hold
my breath.

If anyone has a noisy winder (clunks or clanks), have a look at this site:

http://www2.bitstream.net/~campbell/

Cheers

John Collier

> From: "Joan & Ken Lee" <klee16@home.com>
> 
> I bought a used Leica Winder M last week. Before I get yelled at or stoned,
> I have a TA Rapidwinder attached to bot my M6s, and they will stay there 95%
> of the time. I bought the winder for several reasons. It appears to be in
> very good shape, is quite quiet and cost $200 Canadian. I intend to use it
> primarily with my 135 attached at vintage car races and local small horse
> shows. I also find the TA Winder awkward to use vertically, so the whirring
> machine might get some portrait use.
> 
> After the long winded stuff comes the questions. The battery compartment has
> a part number of 14402, the winder itself 14403. Is this normal and is this
> the latest model?  The salesman said there was a later model, but I have
> found no reference to one.
> 
>