Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: 35/2 vs 35/2 asph
From: Ken Wilcox <wilcox@tir.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 15:29:58 -0400

Bill:

I have a 70s version and the ASPH. The sharpness is quite a bit better on
the ASPH especially at f2. So far the ASPH has not exhibited any flare
which the older lens sometimes (unexpectantly) did.

Ken Wilcox

At 1:30 -0500 5/9/0, a fine scholar, Bill Satterfield wrote:

>I have the non- asph. Is the asph worth trading up to? Any differences
>enough to justify the trade


- ----
Ken Wilcox                                Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits
					  preferred---> <wilcox@tir.com>
 		      			  <kwilcox@gfn.org>