Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 35/2 vs 35/2 asph
From: Bill Satterfield <cwsat@cyberhighway.net>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 15:24:37 -0500
References: <20000509193151.LDUA27609.mail.rdc1.tn.home.com@[24.17.144.74]>

No, mine is tack sharp. I just bought a M5 and ran a roll of Superia, 12
exp., to check it out. First time I have used color in one of my Leicasa nd
I was really impresssed both with the film and the lens the 35/2. I used
color so I could take it to the 1HR Sunday. Normally, I use Tri X at 200
ISO and develop it at 68' for 4:30. I may start shooting some color after
seeing these photos. Thanks.

Henry Ambrose wrote:

> >I have the non- asph. Is the asph worth trading up to? Any differences
> >enough to justify the trade
> >
> I have the 35 f2 ASPH - it is spectacular and incredible.
>
> Is there something you want that your current lens does not do well?
>
> Henry

In reply to: Message from Henry Ambrose <digphoto@nashville.net> (Re: [Leica] 35/2 vs 35/2 asph)