Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Of course the ASPH 35 mm is truelly better wide open !! But is it all ?? perhaps not .. weight and size are good arguments for the "old" one. On the same way I have sold my old 2/35 not to buy the 2/35 ASPH but the 1.4 35 ASPH. In fact the best 1.4/35 mm ever made from 1.4 But I'm still thinking at my old thin 2/35mm which had some other skills (at least the one to be the smallest 35 mm ever). (I'm French and not so used to speak english..) >From: Bill Satterfield <cwsat@cyberhighway.net> >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >To: "leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> >Subject: [Leica] 35/2 vs 35/2 asph >Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 13:30:23 -0500 > >I have the non- asph. Is the asph worth trading up to? Any differences >enough to justify the trade > ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com