Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: noctilux vs. the cheap alternative
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 10:24:07 -0700
References: <003c01bfc67e$1319cc60$1974fdcc@BryanCaldwell> <4.2.2.20000525172932.00ab7c20@infoave.net> <392DB421.2099D20F@home.com> <000901bfc6ed$4152fdd0$4e0a0a0a@simonl> <392E80B3.2ED02734@home.com> <l03130303b554481dc550@[172.16.1.142]>

Ken Wilcox wrote:

> Simon:
> 
> Don't forget that Ted has Sandy to carry his gear!  :-)<<<<<<<<<<

Hey Ken,

C'mon buddy., :-)  heck of late I've been doing all the damn carrying
while she's away shhoting on assignment.  But she doesn't like the
Noctilux and prefers the 35 1.4  Asph. on her M6. And damn she sure is a
mean shooter with it as she has developed into a very fine PJ!

She has a web site if you care to have a peek:

http://www.portfolios.com/profile.wga?MyUrl=15784.carter

I remind her how nice I treated her as an assistant, so when she needs
one she'll be nice to me. ;-)  It's the old story of, "Always be good to
the hired help,  some day you maybe working for them!"

ted

In reply to: Message from "Bryan Caldwell" <bcaldwell@softcom.net> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (RE: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from "Simon Lamb" <s_lamb@compuserve.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from kwilcox@mail.davison.k12.mi.us (Ken Wilcox) ([Leica] Re: noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)