Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Tell Me About This Lens and Charlton Heston
From: Peterson Arthur G NSSC <PetersonAG@NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 10:06:14 -0400

Yeah, I agree, Bud.  Those early bayonet R hoods were great, especially the
one for the 50mm Summilux that would reverse on the lens for storage, thus
avoiding getting lost.  In fact, the hood I have for the Noctilux (hood
#12539, if I recall) bayonets on in similar fashion, but it had no provision
for bayonetting (sp?) in reverse position for storage (for what reason I
cannot imagine---just an oversight perhaps?).  However I was able to cut
reverse notches in the inside rim of the hood that now allow it to do that.

Art Peterson


		-----Original Message-----
		From:	Bud Cook [mailto:budcook@attglobal.net]
		Sent:	Wednesday, June 07, 2000 11:20 PM
		To:	leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
		Subject:	Re: [Leica] Tell Me About This Lens and
Charlton Heston

		The 12575 fits the 90 Elmar, the 90 Elmarit, the 135 Hector
and the 135
		Tele-Elmar.  It reverses over the lens and has  plastic cap.

		The 12585 fits the f/3.5, f/2.8 and f/2.0 35mm lenses as
well as the 50
		Elmar and Summicron lenses.   It will hold a 39mm filter and
will reverse
		over the Rigid Summicron.

		The hoods that I find to be really nice are the cast
aluminum hoods that
		bayonet to the early R lenses, especially the ones with the
built-in
		polarizer rotation.

		Bud

		----- Original Message -----
		From: <Jlaird@aol.com>
		To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
		Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 9:15 PM
		Subject: Re: [Leica] Tell Me About This Lens and Charlton
Heston


		> In a message dated 06/07/2000 11:14:35 AM Central Daylight
Time,
		> Sonnar502@aol.com writes:
		>
		> > Two caveats: I absolutely despise that ridiculous
"condom" hood too.  In
		my
		> >  limited experience with Leica stuff, it's ranks as a
joke!  While I'm
		not
		> >  fond of the pull-out ones either, at least they'll take
*some* bump -
		> unlike
		> >
		> >  this goofey rubber thingy.  Makes me nervous....  #2: a
regular E39
		filter
		> >  no-worko too well with the threads on outer ring of the
hood.  Is this
		> >  normal? or is the ring torqued a bit?  Jim, anyone? any
ideas?  It
		> irritates
		> >
		> >  me on those occasions when I want a green or yellow
filter.....
		> >
		>
		> I've heard the 12585 hood will fit the 'skinny' 90 2.8, as
well as the
		50mm 2
		> and the 35 2. Not sure myself because I made the grave
mistake of selling
		my
		> 90 2.8 back in the seventies when I was poor...should have
gotten another
		job
		> instead! I didn't like the 'condom' hood either, although
I did on
		occasion
		> bump the lens into stuff and it protected the front
element pretty well.
		>
		> Jim
		>
		> Jim
		>
		

Replies: Reply from "Bud Cook" <budcook@attglobal.net> (Re: [Leica] Tell Me About This Lens and Charlton Heston)