Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Was: Tell Me About This Lens Now: TE versus new elmarit
From: Bill Satterfield <cwsat@cyberhighway.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 09:12:31 -0500
References: <OFA7E4C57F.2244F05A-ON862568F8.0059C771@internal.nextlink.net> <3.0.5.32.20000612084636.008f6dc0@pop.microtec.net>
 
I like the TE becuase of it's size and weight. The 2 is heavy and big. The TE
is a good walking around lens and the 2 is not. The 2 is not being used and I
thought if I got the latest 2.8, I would have two good lens to use.Any reason
to keep the 2?

Dan Cardish wrote:

> Why keep the TE if you are getting the newer 2.8.  Or vice versa?
>
> Dan C.
>
> At 08:20 AM 12-06-00 -0500, Bill Satterfield wrote:
> >I have the 90/2.8 TE as well as the 90/2 non- asph. I was thinking about
> >selling the 2 and getting the latest 2.8 and keep the TE. Any thoughts on
> what
> >I should do?
> >
> >drodgers@nextlink.com wrote:
> >
Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Was: Tell Me About This Lens Now: TE versus new elmarit)
 In reply to: Message from drodgers@nextlink.com (Re: [Leica] Tell Me About This Lens and Charlton Heston)
Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> ([Leica] Re: Was: Tell Me About This Lens Now: TE versus new elmarit)