Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 20:07:26 +0200
References: <D188C0B350C0D211ACB10008C75D7CA302E03121@nssczeusex9.navsea.navy.mil> <015101bfd4b6$04f27c40$a882e0d8@i928653> <v04011701b56c0b902ee9@[169.132.153.122]>

Well, I already got in trouble over Eggleston once, so I am kind of immune...

Nathan

Guy Bennett wrote:

> watch it, nathan,
>
> using the 'a' word around here is likely to get you into trouble! every one
> knows that leicas and a** have absolutely nothing to do with one another
> and should *never* be mentioned in the same breath!
>
> repent while there's still time!
>
> guy
>
> p.s. and don't forget that when leica goes out of business any moment now,
> the a** issue becomes a moot point!

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Overijse, Belgium and Zurich, Switzerland
e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
General photo page: http://members.tripod.com/belgiangator
Belgium photo page: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman

In reply to: Message from Peterson Arthur G NSSC <PetersonAG@NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL> (RE: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)
Message from "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)
Message from Guy Bennett <guybnt@idt.net> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)