Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: Re: noctilux 50 f1.0
From: Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 16:54:20 -0700
References: <4.1.20000613145437.05843270@gateway.photoaccess.com> <3931AA75.1D2E62D2@home.com> <NCBBJJFDBJBLCEDPPLKGMEFHKJAA.msadat@pacbell.net> <4.1.20000613145437.05843270@gateway.photoaccess.com> <4.1.20000613160816.0583e9e0@gateway.photoaccess.com>

B+W & Heliopan make thin filters that should not vignette much, if at all.

jim


At 04:29 PM 6/13/00 -0700, Tom Schofield wrote:
>OK, OK, I'll share a brief synopsis of the test roll I shot to determine
>vignetting with filters on the Noctilux.
>
>Rule 1:  any step-down will cause vignetting.
>
>Rule 2:  Even an E-60 Leitz C-Pol will cause vigneting.
>
>Rule 3:  A single B+W or a slim Heliopan works w/out vignetting.
>
>Rule 3:  A step-up in size to 62 mm or larger works w/out vignetting, but
>you are cutting into your field of view.
>
>So, Jim is right -- an 060 is probably all you will ever need except perhaps
>a KB-12 for night chromes.  (And, it's probably warm enough so an 81A isn't
>necessary anyway.)
>
>Tom

NO FILTER

Replies: Reply from "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Re: noctilux 50 f1.0)
In reply to: Message from Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com> ([Leica] Re: noctilux 50 f1.0)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> ([Leica] WAS: noctilux vs. the cheap alternative. now 50mm)
Message from mehrdad sadat <msadat@pacbell.net> ([Leica] noctilux 50 f1.0)
Message from Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com> ([Leica] Re: noctilux 50 f1.0)
Message from Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com> ([Leica] Re: Re: noctilux 50 f1.0)