Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seems a shame.
From: "Dan Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:14:53 -0700
References: <DC1F47F8EE84D311A2960008C73318C108B13D@EX-EC-QUITO>

Duane-
Most women would say they have better things to do, than to sit around and
talk about scots whisky, arcane cameras, and what to do with old underwear!
:o)
To them, black tape is for sealing the cracks in a leaky vacuum cleaner
hose, because their significant other is spending all his time and money on
Leicas-
Film is something you don't want on your clean windows and mirrors-
Incomplete development is how they would describe their spouses' mental
development-
And BOKEH? It should be pronounced 'boo-KAY', and should cost at least $20
 and not obtained at the local supermarket!)
Women, bless 'em, are probably just too darn smart to get involved with the
likes of us!
Dan ( Honey, can I get you anything from the fridge while I'm out here in
the kitchen?) Post

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seems a shame.)
In reply to: Message from "Birkey, Duane" <dbirkey@hcjb.org.ec> ([Leica] Incidentally, why are there so few women on the LUG? Seems a sham e.)