Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] M5: old vs new manufacturing
From: "Bud Cook" <budcook@attglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:27:35 -0500
References: <B58AA1ED.6F93%jbcollier@home.com>

John,
I never mentioned front ends.   Let's just agree to disagree.
Bud

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "John Collier" <jbcollier@home.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] M5: old vs new manufacturing


> Ok. I was going to let this one slide but......I cannot. Almost every car
> produced today does not have adjustable basic alignment angles. The Vega
was
> not the first with this, just the least successful. It was a very poorly
> engineered car. If the alignment is off on a new car something is bent or
> worn otherwise it never goes out period. The older cars used adjustable
> front ends because of the inability of the manufacturer to build to tight
> tolerances. Manufacturing has changed and now they have the ability to be
> more precise, economical and much more reliable.
>
> John Collier
>
> > From: "Bud Cook" <budcook@attglobal.net>
> >
> > Remember the old Chevy Vega?   It was designed so that no adjustments
were
> > possible.  Those cars would eventually reach a point where they simply
> > couldn't be repaired.
>
>

In reply to: Message from John Collier <jbcollier@home.com> (Re: [Leica] M5: old vs new manufacturing)