Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] A dicey proposition
From: "Craig Roberts" <croberts@zoomtel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:47:00 -0400
References: <B5B84B8C.13E2A%john@pinkheadedbug.com> <000f01c002eb$5ab734a0$131110ac@zoomtel.com> <005101c002f1$16c72e20$640210ac@siege.jcberger.com>

"... this picture (http://www.camera-exchange.de/cam-exch/fotos/WZLAHN.JPG)
from their site urges me to buy a Summicron 35mm. Fine result ;-)."  -
Jean-Claude


Really, Jean-Claude!  Have you no artistic sensitivity, Monsieur?  THAT is a
salon-quality example of the gorgeous, creamy "Leica look" many of us
attempt to achieve by the judicious use of thumbprint impregnated UV
filters.   (BTW, if the same image is rendered by a Nikkor or Canon lens,
the proper characterization is "blurry").

You will note on his Website that Herr Lang offers lessons in digital
scanner use.  With proper instruction ANY of us can achieve results such as
his!

Craig
Boston

Replies: Reply from "Jean-Claude Berger" <jcberger@jcberger.com> (Re: [Leica] A dicey proposition)
In reply to: Message from John Brownlow <john@pinkheadedbug.com> (Re: [Leica] Vacation... lighten up)
Message from "Craig Roberts" <croberts@zoomtel.com> (Re: [Leica] A dicey proposition)
Message from "Jean-Claude Berger" <jcberger@jcberger.com> (Re: [Leica] A dicey proposition)