Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] leave it to them
From: "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 17:23:12 -0700
References: <64DC8FA90382D411BA060090277AEE41294DA6@nt-exchange-bby.pmc-sierra.bc.ca>

At 5:39 PM -0400 9/28/00, Martin Howard wrote:
>Paul Chefurka jotted down the following:
>
>> SS is almost a metacritic - a critic of _an_ art rather than a critic of
>> examples of that art.
>
>A metacritic would be someone who critiques critics, not someone who
>critiques an art, rather than samples of that art.  The latter would still
>be an art critic, although perhaps one whose critique is more interesting to
>read.
>
>M.
>
>--
>Martin Howard                     | "It's such a fine line between genious
>Visiting Scholar, CSEL, OSU       |  and stupidity."
>email: howard.390@osu.edu         |        -- David St. Hubbins
>www: http://mvhoward.i.am/        +---------------------------------------

'bout time to get back to your thesis, isn't it, Martin???

Even e-mail procrastination has it's limits.




                                               :-)




   *            Henning J. Wulff
  /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
 /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
 |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com

In reply to: Message from Paul Chefurka <Paul_Chefurka@pmc-sierra.com> (RE: [Leica] leave it to them)