Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Johnny Deadman wrote: > > on 29/9/00 3:04 pm, Bill Lawlor at wvl@marinternet.com wrote: > > > What would you do? "Travel light" and just stick with the 35 and 90mm-lens, > > or buy the 50mm Summicron additionaly? What is your experience? Would the > > 50mm 'cron be a wise completion or just another heavyweight to carry > > around? > > How many bodies are you carrying? > > If 2: > > I think the 50 is, pardon me, the spare prick at the wedding here. You end > up with a 35 and a 50 or a 90 and a 50 or a 35 and a 90. The only sensible > combination here is the last one, so the 50 is surplus to requirements. If > you had a 28 and a 90 I might sing a different tune. > > -- > Johnny Deadman > Here I've found an issue i can disagree with Johnny on. Love 50's! Would find the gap between the 35 and 90 to be a canyon. The Grandiose Canyon! I walked a bunch a miles yesterday with a 35 and a 50. No nothin else. Oh and a camera! And clothes! Mark the shark