Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] a rose is a rose is a rose (more color v bw)
From: Johnny Deadman <john@pinkheadedbug.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 12:20:15 -0400

no attack, steve. I don't know where you got that one.
- -- 
Johnny Deadman

http://www.pinkheadedbug.com


> From: "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net>
> Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 11:19:46 -0400
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] a rose is a rose is a rose (more color v bw)
> 
>> The color one is meant to be 'muted' and 'pastel'. But 'lifeless' is another
>> way of looking at it, I guess. As to whether it's a good sample... it's not
>> a sample... it's a genuine question I was asking myself.
> 
> 
> hmmmmm...you seem to be in an attack mode, sorry, I should have read your
> mind and referred to the picture as 'muted' and 'pastel'
> 
> Steve
> Annapolis