Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think it's like the sign on the mortician's place of business: "Remains to be seen" --- I respect the work Henry Wilhelm and others are doing to assess the archival quality of the new stuff, but I think that claims of 100+ years of longevity, for products that have only been on the market for a few months, is a bit of a reach. Chuck Albertson Seattle, Wash. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Fisher" <tekapo@golden.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 5:44 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Just a thought > > B. D. > > B. D., as someone who's been putting in long hours FB printing this past > week, I've been following what you're saying. I don't want to be > contentious, as I am actually quite ignorant about most printing processes, > but my first concern is longevity: are the new digital prints as archival as > the old wet prints? > > Cheers, Dave > >