Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2000/10/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital is not photography (long)
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 16:27:42 -0800
References: <9DC5E2ABE65BD54CA9088DA3194461D6010C7A50@BBY1EXM01> <B6235D07.4A95%john@pinkheadedbug.com> <bl1svso4ridfcelvebaf58ehkobjsp77in@4ax.com>
><Snip>
> Thank God I'm not a student, a critic or a producer. I make straightforward
> distinctions: "Lethal Weapon IV" was a movie, "Babette's Feast" was a film. It
> works for me. Now where'd I put that moustache wax?
>
> Paul
I like the term: Flick.
I think "Wings of Desire" was a nice Flick!
:)
(Der Himmel über Berlin)
mark rabiner
In reply to:
Message from Paul Chefurka <Paul_Chefurka@pmc-sierra.com> (RE: [Leica] Digital is not photography (long))
Message from Johnny Deadman <john@pinkheadedbug.com> (Re: [Leica] Digital is not photography (long))
Message from Paul Chefurka <chefurka@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Digital is not photography (long))