Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] WAS: That word again. NOW: Erwin & Mikie :-)
From: Ted <tedgrant@home.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 09:25:33 -0800
References: <B61BCAC0.477%michaeljohnston@ameritech.net>

Guys guys,

Whatever you do,  don't don't stop !!!!!!  Please keep these personal accolades
coming as it's great entertainment and almost beats Abbott and Costello's "Who's
on First?" routine.

Keep 'em coming we need more fun things on the LUG! :-)

ted


Mike Johnston wrote:

> > There is no Leica glow. So every receipt is right. Mr Johnstons advice to
> > use a low contrast about standard focal length lens, with a classic silver
> > rich film, overexpose by a stop, develop short, use a diffusion enlarger and
> > use FB paper and print with low contrast  is a remarkable nonsensical piece
> > of
> > photographic technique. It will give you results that are as flat as some
> > scientists in the past thought about the radius of the earth. If this is the
> > essence of what a century of photographic research has come up, I welcome
> > the age of digital photography. That will be refreshing in the extreme.
>
>
>
> I'd be happy to provide you with a sterling, beautiful example, Erwin old
> boy. Just send me $350 American, and I'll mail you a print made with
> precisely the technique I described. As you'll see, it's gorgeous. If you
> were to allow yourself of a modicum of poetic license, you might even say
> it...glows.
>
> 316 Windsor Drive, Waukesha, WI 53186.
>
> Don't thank me. My pleasure.
>
> <g>
>
> --Mike

In reply to: Message from Mike Johnston <michaeljohnston@ameritech.net> ([Leica] That word again)