Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Vs: [Leica] hexar vs leica lenses
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 10:45:14 -0800
References: <00b301c04cd2$31802a20$7cb79cc3@default>

Raimo Korhonen wrote:
> 
> Well - PopPhoto tested them (June 2000) and wrote: "These are simply three of the best lenses we have ever tested in their respective focal lengths". Note that they say "of the best" and not just "the best".
> According to Erwin the Leica lenses are still THE best - and I suspect that Erwin uses even larger magnifications than the 20x24" of PopPhoto.
> As I have no personal experience of these lenses, I cannot comment any further.
> All the best!
> Raimo
> photos at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
> 
Raimo really how are these cheap lens going to be better than Leica lenses???!!!!!
Just hold one in your hand and look at it! Check the price tag!
It IS true you don't always get what you pay for but is this really an example
of that?
PopPhoto's credibility goes right down the drain when they make such ridiculous assertions.

PopPhoto tested them (June 2000) and wrote: "These are simply the biggest new
advertizing account and source for continued revenue we have taken on for a long
time." 
(parody)

mark rabiner
:)
http://spokenword.to/rabiner/

In reply to: Message from "Raimo Korhonen" <raimo.korhonen@pp2.inet.fi> (Vs: [Leica] hexar vs leica lenses)