Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] 35-70/3.5 vs 35-70/3.5
From: "Paul Arnold" <osprey@bmt.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:45:48 -0700
References: <B6363D5A.957C%howard.390@osu.edu>
 
Wrong. Yes is on second.

- -- Paul Arnold


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Howard" <howard.390@osu.edu>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] 35-70/3.5 vs 35-70/3.5


> John Collier jotted down the following:
>
> > I give up.
> >
> > Who is on first again?
>
> Yes.
>
> M. ;)
>
> --
> Martin Howard                     | "Common sense is just the layer of
> Visiting Scholar, CSEL, OSU       | prejudices put down before the age of
> email: howard.390@osu.edu         | eighteen."  -- Albert Einstein
> www: http://mvhoward.i.am/        +---------------------------------------
>
>
In reply to: Message from Martin Howard <howard.390@osu.edu> (Re: [Leica] 35-70/3.5 vs 35-70/3.5)