Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] More Noctilux vs. Summicron
From: "Paul Arnold" <osprey@bmt.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 07:10:41 -0700
References: <004501c04fcd$9dafad80$b7111840@computer>

Sal,

This is not a complaint message, just a seeking of information.



Occasionally I get messages from LUGers that come into my Inbox rather than
to my LUG Inbox. That happens because the address of the sender (you in this
case) is not included in my instructions directing messages to the LUG
Inbox. This message addressed to Sal did come to my general Inbox, not my
LUG Inbox.

Did you send this message by hitting the reply button while LUG was on your
screen? I'm reasonably sure you didn't address the message directly to me.
Were you wanting to send an off-list message to Simon?

I'm in no way annoyed at getting the message, but I am curious as to how
these things happen.

Thanks.

- -- Paul Arnold
Dillon, Montana


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Sal DiMarco,Jr." <sdmp007@pressroom.com>
To: <simon@camera-craftsman.com>
Cc: "LUG >for posts" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 6:03 AM
Subject: [Leica] More Noctilux vs. Summicron


> Simon,
>     When people are in a quiet conversation, you would be surprised how
> still they stay.
> I have not run into the problem.
>     Also, in this type of marginal light, I would shoot a lot more film
than
> I would in goodlight.
> Cheers,
> Sal
>

Replies: Reply from Nicholas Poole <nick.botton@camphill.org.uk> (Re: [Leica] Email posts)
In reply to: Message from "Sal DiMarco,Jr." <sdmp007@pressroom.com> ([Leica] More Noctilux vs. Summicron)