Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Last I heard, misrepresentation of a material fact is grounds for rescission of a contract, without having to establish intent to defraud; so, if the dealer said you're lens purchase entitles you to the rebate, you can argue you're entitled to rescind, return the lens, and get your $$ back. Depending on the integrity of your dealer, you may have to sue to do so, which probably isn't worth the $150, in either monetary terms or emotional terms. Tom - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Arnold" <osprey@bmt.net> To: "Leica Users Group" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 11:30 AM Subject: [Leica] Fraud/Breach of Contract > Martin Howard opined: > > > > > You'd have to establish intent in a fraud case. In a breach of contract, > > the facts would speak for themselves. > > > > You are wading into waters deep and swift, Martin. Best not to go in unless > you're wearing a lawyer. > > -- Paul > Paul Arnold > 22 Sunrise St. > Dillon, Montana > Visit MY GALLERY at: > http://www.geocities.com/osprey59725/index.html >