Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] tuck's great bokeh...
From: Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 17:12:29 -0600
References: <45EDA71CFF25D411A2E400508B6FC52A7557B7@orportexch1.internal.nextlink.net>

Wanta sell your Zig? Will it work on a Beseler 45 MXT? Does it have directions
on using on a Beseler?

"Rodgers, David" wrote:

> guy
>
> >>i've often said the same thing - "gotta use something slower than 400."
> but
> each time i've done so (usually slowing down to 100), i find that i miss a
> hell of a lot of shots, 'cause all things considered, i more often than not
> shoot indoors in low light or outdoors at twilight or at night.
> the big bright outdoor shots are few and far between.<<
>
> I can't seem to get by with one b/w film. I was using FP4+ and HP5+, and
> pushing the latter. But I'm in the process of switching to Neopan 1600
> rather than HP5+.
>
> I've used 400 speed film for years, but seems like the last year it's been
> too much of a compromise; too fast for outside and too slow for inside.
>
> Dave
>
> BTW   While playing catch up with my LUG reading I noticed posts about film
> resolution, the value of quality lenses, et al. It's all very important
> stuff. But no lens is an island. The best lens I bought in recent years was
> a Zig-align for my enlarger. It improved ALL my other lenses, considerably.
> Plus now I know any bokeh I see is from the taking lens, and not the
> enlarger lens :-).
>
>

In reply to: Message from "Rodgers, David" <david.rodgers@xo.com> (Re: [Leica] tuck's great bokeh...)