Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] ROR vs. ClearSight
From: "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@home.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 22:43:36 -0700
References: <B67BC98F.3D9B%howard.390@osu.edu> <017101c077a2$0a8b9120$6882e0d8@joecodis>

I also would like to try it...Steve-------Steve

- -------Steve Barbour
         Phoenix,  Arizona........

         kididdoc@home.com


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] ROR vs. ClearSight


> Martin,
>
> There are no secrets in producing a cleaner. A surfactant (soap or other
> cleaning agent) is the chemical compound that does the job. The type of
> cleaning agent used is the key to how well the job is done. Effectiveness,
> lack of residue, toxicity etc. are some of the considerations in choosing
> the brand.
> ROR, the most popular uses ammonia as its active ingredient. Zeiss uses
> alcohol. I have no idea if either of these hold other ingredients.
> ClearSight is a concoction of three active ingredients plus other
additives
> listed in http://www.thegrid.net/joecodi/clearsight.html
>
> Since you seem to be a skeptic, send me your address and I will send you a
> sample. You can decide for yourself if it is as good as many LUGers have
> discovered. As for a cloth, if you do not have well used shorts, I'll send
> you an official lens cleaning cloth.
>
> Cheers,
> Joe Codispoti
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Howard" <howard.390@osu.edu>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 3:57 PM
> Subject: [Leica] ROR vs. ClearSight
>
>
> >
> > So what's the deal with this ClearSight stuff?  About a year and a half
> ago,
> > there was a spate of glowing reports on the LUG about ROR which toted it
> as
> > the greatest invention Man has seen since the advent of indoor plumbing.
> > After soliloqies on its soluability, I eventually bought a bottle, but
use
> > it more for cleaning DVDs from BlockBuster than lenses (for some strange
> > reason, the person who rents the DVD before me always insists on
touching
> > the recorded side with their greasy fingers).
> >
> > Now all of a sudden one could -- after reading the LUG recently -- be
> > forgiven for thinking that ROR is no more effective than soapy water and
> > that ClearSight is the way to go.  So, what's the deal?  Is ClearSight
> > "better"?  The same stuff in a different bottle?  Or are lens-cleaning
> fluid
> > manufacturers simply trying to subvert us by using a few corrupt LUGGERs
> to
> > influence the rest of us? ;)
> >
> > M.
> >
> > --
> > Martin Howard               | "...key features are the distinctive rear
> > Visiting Scholar, CSEL, OSU | lighting clusters that make the Maserati
> > email: howard.390@osu.edu   | 3200GT instantly recognizable to anyone
> > www: http://mvhoward.i.am/  | overtaken by it."  -- Maserati sales lit.
> >
+--------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>

In reply to: Message from Martin Howard <howard.390@osu.edu> ([Leica] ROR vs. ClearSight)
Message from "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net> (Re: [Leica] ROR vs. ClearSight)