Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Stefan; The 24 mm's performance can't be argued with. The fact that it's so dim viewing through it is nerve-wracking. I used my old 24 on an RE and R6, even tried a different screen from Beattie. It was still dark, in my opinion, so I traded it away. My 19, old design, was brighter in the viewfinder than the 24 mm. Slobodan Dimitrov stefan smith wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm thinking of investing in the R system to go along > with my M. Looking at the 24mm f2.8 -- Erwin seems to > say this is OK but about level with the Nikon 24mm and > not up to the M 24mm ASPH. Any users out there want to > share their experiences? I may go for a 28mm if it is > is a better performer even though it's not as wide. > Also the 180mm f4 seems a good buy, and alot cheaper > than the f3.4 APO - any comments on this one? > > As for the body I'm set on an R6.2. > > thx in advance. > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online! > http://photos.yahoo.com/