Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on 1/24/01 6:35 PM, Jim Brick at jim_brick@agilent.com wrote: >> Absolutely the 35. The 50 isn't a patch on it. The 35 is a world-beating >> lens, while the 50 struggles wide open and (IMO) is due for a recomputation. >> >> The 50 is a NICE lens. The 35 is a GREAT one. >> >> -- >> Johnny Deadman > > This is probably why I use my 50 Summilux more than I use my 35 Summilux > ASPH. I like the look of the photographs taken with the 50 Summilux. That > "Leica look." Like using a Noctilux at f/1.4 . Sure. Or the non-asph 35 lux. Totally distinctive. - -- Johnny Deadman http://www.pinkheadedbug.com