Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] DOF: Erwin
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 11:51:50 -0800
References: <B6A9CF7B.E2A2%jbcollier@home.com> <00dc01c09380$c21002a0$0201a8c0@marklaptop>

Erwin has a nice page on DOF issues:
http://www.imx.nl/photosite/technical/DoF/DoF.html

I quote out of context to pique your interest:

"Many pictures are viewed from a distance that is too short for the proper
perspective. 
Depth of Field is larger when the format shrinks, compared to any bigger format
when all other factors are held constant. 
Conclusion.
The DoF tables are all based on the convenient assumption that the permissible
CoC on the negative will not exceed a diameter of 33 micron or 0.03mm. That is
the basis of ALL DoF tables, from Agfa to Zeiss. It may be the case that the
engraved values on the lens do not correspond to this, but then the engraving is
a matter of precision or seen as a rough guide. There are no laws to specify the
tolerance of the engraving on a lens."
It continues.


markrabiner

Replies: Reply from "Jacques Bilinski" <jbilin@axionet.com> (Re: [Leica] DOF: Erwin)
Reply from Shan <shan@montana.net> (Re: [Leica] DOF: Erwin)
In reply to: Message from John Collier <jbcollier@home.com> (Re: [Leica] DOF: Depth of Field article online)
Message from "Mark_E_Davison" <Mark_E_Davison@email.msn.com> (Re: [Leica] DOF: Depth of Field article online)