Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] RE: Re: focus shift due to filter?
From: Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:43:11 -0800
References: <4.1.20010221080734.01cd0320@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com>

I'm showing unbridled restraint!

Jim


At 01:24 PM 2/21/01 -0500, Austin Franklin wrote:
>Seriously, this was a legitimate question, Jim...  Are legitimate questions
>not acceptable now?
>
>Who's criminny anyway?  My spell checker keeps trying to change it to
>acrimony...
>
>> Jeez Austin. For criminny sake!!!
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>> At 10:19 AM 2/21/01 -0500, Austin Franklin wrote:
>> >A claim has been made (elsewhere) that using a UV filter will
>> cause a 'focus
>> >shift', which, would be more critical for a
>> rangefinder...depending on how
>> >shifted the focus is.
>> >
>> >What are the facts around this claim?  I take a Hasselblad with
>> a 110/2, and
>> >a magnifying hood...critically focus on something ~3' away, and
>> I don't see
>> >a focus change with a UV filter on or off...and all my Noctilux
>> and Summilux
>> >images are dead on focus wide open...and I do use UV filters,
>> and I do a LOT
>> >of close up work...I would think I'd see it there.
>> >
>> >Perhaps there is some focus shift, but it is certainly not significant.
>>

In reply to: Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: focus shift due to filter?)