Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Film Tests
From: "Dan Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:58:41 -0500
References: <B6BAF2BC.10A5%douglas@dysmedia.com>

Douglas-
The NC of the films designation means Neutral Color! You might try the 160VC
(Vivid Color!)
I preferred it to the NC when I did my Neice's wedding as the colors
weremuch better in subdued light.
Dan
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Cooper" <douglas@dysmedia.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 4:45 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re: Film Tests


> Well, I have peculiar results to report.  I just did an experiment with
two
> color negative films:  one consumer-grade and one professional.  I tried
> Kodak Gold, to see if I could get away with it if I'm stuck in the middle
of
> nowhere and have to buy from the local drugstore; I also tried Portra
160NC
> to see whether Kodak had at last produced a flavor of pro color film that
I
> could live with.
>
> I *much* prefer the Gold.  (Not Royal Gold, just ordinary stuff.)  Given,
> this might have been a result of my cheapskate processing methods -- I
take
> stuff to the local two-hour place, then blow up the prints myself if I
like
> them.  I'm sure their machines are tuned to Gold, as it's a commercial
> standard.  Nevertheless, I get great results from Reala, NHGII, Fuji
160 --
> in short, most films.
>
> I hate this Portra stuff.  Washed-out skin tones (useful in some
> circumstances, true); dull colors, favoring brown (which might please the
> Kodachrome cult); not particularly sharp.  When compared to the Fuji
> equivalent, it's no contest
>
> Gold, on the other hand, is a nice, punchy film.  Skin tones a bit red in
> the shadows, but this made my model simply look healthy; bright colors
> beautifully rendered; grays considerably more neutral than with the Portra
> -- perhaps tending towards the blue side. Sharper than the Portra, but
with
> the ASA this is to be expected.  This will be my substitute for Reala,
when
> I can't find the latter.  Certainly much nicer than Superia 100.
>
> cheers,
>
> Douglas Cooper
> http://www.dysmedia.com
>
>
> NO ARCHIVE
>
>