Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] C-41 negative material for B&W
From: "onetreehillclw" <onetreehillclw@compaq.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 22:05:20 -0600
References: <20010225031150.IVXZ29358.femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com@[65.1.114.25]>

LONG LIVE XP2--- for darkrooms, i love it!

Chris

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Henry Ambrose" <digphoto@telalink.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] C-41 negative material for B&W


> Mark Rabiner  wrote:
> >There is much talk of increased scannablity of the C41 black and white
> >films but this has not been succinctly demonstrated.
> You're usually right - but not this time.
> It's a fact about XP2 and T400CN. They scan better.
> Those dye clouds let light through to the CCDs and give a much finer
> result than any conventional 400 film for scanning. Silver particles are
> opaque. You'll get varying degrees of artifacts around them and the grain
> is often exaggerated. Finer grain films to a lesser extent.
> >It makes sense that if one gets rid of his darkroom printing why bother
with
> >making the negs as well.
> >XP2 is great stuff but will it replace Neopan 1600 in Xtol?? Delta 100 in
> >Xtol? or even Delta 400.
> >Not for me. I'd rather run it myself and control it's output and know
it's
> >going
> >to last.
> Now you're talking.
> C41 B&W films are not a replacement for conventional flims.
> They're in addition too those films. A new flavor.
>
> Henry
> CAN I HAVE CHOCOLATE SAUCE ON MY ICE CREAM?

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] C-41 negative material for B&W)
In reply to: Message from Henry Ambrose <digphoto@telalink.net> (Re: [Leica] C-41 negative material for B&W)