Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 12 is up
From: Jem Kime <jem.kime@cwcom.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:33:27 +0100

The 'Collie' (er...) wrote,
"Too bad about the dog's feet getting cut off"

Methinks that considering it was a PAW photo, (no it's quite good really) that it was too bad the paws were omitted,
Jem ;-)

- -----Original Message-----
From:	John Collier [SMTP:jbcollier@home.com]
Sent:	28 March 2001 18:09
To:	leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject:	Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 12 is up

Too bad about the dog's feet getting cut off.

JBC

> From: "Rob Conley" <rconley@mprc.umaryland.edu>
> 
> Nice shot, and i think that's usually the 'right way for us to get that types
> of shot.
> 
 
> See at:
> 
> http://www.geocities.com/belgiangator/pawindex.htm
> 
> and comments are welcome and appreciated as always.
> 
> Nathan
>

Replies: Reply from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 12 is up)
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 12 is up)