Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Tri-X
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 09:00:16 -0400
References: <200104080701.AAA03786@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <3.0.6.32.20010408140425.009a6930@POP6.sympatico.ca> <3.0.6.32.20010408164904.009aa690@POP6.sympatico.ca>

Dan Cardish wrote:
> 
> If it works for him at 800 and it works for him at 200, funny how it
> doesn't work for him at 200.
> 
> dan c.
> 
> At 01:15 PM 08-04-01 -0700, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> >Jim Marshall shoots it at 800 but sometimes 200, never 400.
> >I always shoot it at 400.
> >With my Developers the number on the box is right on the money!

I may be missing something here, but I don't think Mark is saying Tri-X
doesn't work for Jim Marshall at 400, only that he doesn't shoot it at
400. Big difference.
B. D.

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Tri-X)
In reply to: Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Tri-X)
Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Tri-X)