Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Victor Point 1. was the reason for buying a new one and not trying to find second hand example. Point 2. - I'll have to wait and see, the frames are popping up ok at the moment. Point 3. - Don't know yet. Steve - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Victor Wek Sent: 10 April 2001 16:20 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Tri-Elmar I had use old Tri-Elmar for a while, but 1.The lens did not have deep of field scale, now it was changed. 2.When I changed focal length i.e. from 28mm to 50mm the proper frame did not jump to place on my M6TTL (0.72), sometimes. The new Tri-Elmar has the same mechanic. After few rolls of film, what will be your experience? 3.From a user ( not technician) point of view, I did not have chance to compare Tri-Elmar against any single focal length lens. Is the difference visible? New Tri-Elmar is on my list ‘next to buy’. I’d like to have decent 28mm and specially 50mm, until next 50ies generation comes up. Thanks, Victor