Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/04/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] NIKON OT - PERSONAL REPLY SOUGHT
From: Isaac Crawford <isaac@visi.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 15:22:05 -0400
References: <5.0.1.4.0.20010421175838.00aac6c0@206.34.200.40> <B70773BB.672A%howard.390@osu.edu> <l03130300b706849cc9c6@[216.40.161.63]> <5.0.1.4.0.20010421201637.00a77b40@206.34.200.40> <3AE2CA2B.6BE002A4@earthlink.net> <3AE32820.DA4AFFCD@visi.net>
Isaac Crawford wrote:
>
> "B. D. Colen" wrote:
> >
> > Would anyone who will off-line admit to using both a Nikon F100 and F3,
> > or who has done so recently enough to have a good memory of the foibles
> > and strengths of the F3, please contact me off-line.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > B. D.
Oops... so sorry, supposed to be off list...
<snip>
>
In reply to:
Message from "Michael E. Bérubé" <MEB@goodphotos.com> ([Leica] Elmar question)
Message from Martin Howard <howard.390@osu.edu> (Re: [Leica] Re: Film Demise)
Message from "Michael E. Bérubé" <MEB@goodphotos.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Elmar question)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> ([Leica] NIKON OT - PERSONAL REPLY SOUGHT)
Message from Isaac Crawford <isaac@visi.net> (Re: [Leica] NIKON OT - PERSONAL REPLY SOUGHT)