Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Voigtlander 21/f4
From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 17:44:30 -0700
References: <001301c0db54$82c8afe0$f609113f@computer> <3AFE0409.2BF469F7@earthlink.net> <f05010419b723ffbdec0c@[195.64.98.82]> <3AFED37A.1FDD7A74@earthlink.net> <004e01c0dc06$ad2d1020$5a0e113f@computer>

I always test with an emulsion I'm currently using. I've been pleased
and surprised by the tonality of Neopan B/W in 35mm. It just seems to
work very well with Leica and Cosina lenses, giving the image that look
from the late 40's to the late 60's. 
I have tried Neopan in 120, let's just say I've gotten better from
Verichrome. I am, however, curious about the new 100 Neopan in 120. 

Best,
 Slobodan


onetreehillclw wrote:
> 
> I almost always use XP2 when I test new lenses.
> Very sharp 400 b&w. Even with 20x24 prints.
> I'd like to see the Neopan 1600 results. It's a very
> sharp film for that high of speed.
> 
> Chris Williams
> 
>

In reply to: Message from "onetreehillclw" <onetreehillclw@compaq.net> ([Leica] Voigtlander 21/f4)
Message from S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Voigtlander 21/f4)
Message from Christer Almqvist <christer@almqvist.net> (Re: [Leica] Voigtlander 21/f4)
Message from S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Voigtlander 21/f4)
Message from "onetreehillclw" <onetreehillclw@compaq.net> (Re: [Leica] Voigtlander 21/f4)