Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Mods to the 35/1.4
From: Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:58:00 -0700
References: <ab.ac1850c.28563064@aol.com>

At 10:32 AM -0400 6/11/01, TTAbrahams@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 6/10/01 11:31:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
>red735i@earthlink.net writes:
>
><< ubj:  RE: [Leica] Mods to the 35/1.4
>  Date:  6/10/01 11:31:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time
>  From:  red735i@earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
>  Sender:    owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>  Reply-to:  leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>  To:    leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>
>  Only at Infinity?  That seems strange...... and seemingly unlike Tom...
>
>  Tom... are you out there to respond?  Feeling well enough to add fuel to
>  this fire?
>
>  Frank Filippone
>  red735i@earthlink.net
>   >>
>Frank/John,
>The goggled 21 will focus with the goggles - down to about 8 feet -- after
>that
>you have to go scale focus.
>A friend in Sweden has calculated a spacer ring for correcting the 8 feet - to
>0.8 m range - but I have not had time to make one yet.
>All the best,
>Tom A

Hmmmm... I guess I'll have to retract my previous post. I thought it 
was off when I had a look at it. Maybe Reihold adjusted the cam?

- -- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com

In reply to: Message from TTAbrahams@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Mods to the 35/1.4)